Firm profile
Scion
Scion was named in 1 of the 10 executive search firms questions measured by The Shortlist Report, appearing in 21 of the 265 AI responses sampled across those questions (7.9%).
Scion is strongest on “Our executive search is not working. Who can take over?”, where it was named in 21 of 265 responses (7.9%), placing it in tier 4 of that report.
What Scion is surfaced for in executive search firms
Based on the measured answers, Scion is most likely to be surfaced when buyers ask about “Our executive search is not working. Who can take over?”.
How the answers describe the firmConducts retained executive searches for board positions and C-suite roles including CRO, with focus on diverse candidate slates.
In this sample, Scion was named on 1 of the 9 executive search firms ranking questions measured. These are the buyer questions where it appeared most often:
- Failed executive search — named in 21 of 265 responses (7.9%), tier 4.
This describes when the firm is surfaced, not whether it is the right firm to hire. The sample measures recommendation visibility, not client outcomes.
Every question in executive search firms
Scion was named on 1 of these 9 ranking questions. The rest are questions buyers ask that it did not come up for — with whoever did.
Who leads executive search firms overall: Spencer Stuart tops 4 of 9 · Egon Zehnder tops 1 of 9 · Heidrick & Struggles tops 1 of 9 · Korn Ferry tops 1 of 9 · Riviera Partners tops 1 of 9 · Russell Reynolds Associates tops 1 of 9. See all reports.
Where Scion was named
| Question | Tier | Responses | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our executive search is not working. Who can take over? | 4 | 21 of 265 | 7.9% |
What Scion gets named for
Across the 10 executive search firms questions measured, Scion is named most often on “Our executive search is not working. Who can take over?” — it appears in 21 of the 265 ChatGPT responses to that question, or 7.9% of them.
That is the only question in this set where Scion cleared the reporting threshold, so its visibility is concentrated in one kind of buyer question rather than spread across the category.
What Scion’s tier placings mean
On “Our executive search is not working. Who can take over?”, Scion sits in tier 4 of 5, named in 21 of 265 responses (7.9%). That places it below the leading group on this question, where the top firm was named in 61.9% of responses against Scion’s 7.9%. It shares tier 4 with Stanton Chase and DHR Global, which the sample cannot separate from it. 2 further firms were named on this question but fell into lower tiers, meaning the sample did separate Scion from them.
What this page is, and is not
- It is a count of how often AI assistants named Scion when asked buyer questions about executive search firms. Nothing here is a review, a rating, or an assessment of the firm’s work.
- Scion did not submit this listing, was not contacted about it, and cannot pay to change it, move up, or be removed.
- A firm named in few responses may still be excellent. Share follows what has been published about a firm online, which is what an AI assistant reads.
- Wrong details, or a firm merged with another of a similar name? We fix those.