TheShortlist Report

Measured research on who gets recommendedLatest reading

Research · Buying guides · No paid placement

Head to head

Korn Ferry vs Russell Reynolds Associates

Named side by side in 7 executive search firms questions, and the sample does not separate them on the balance of results.

71.6%Korn Ferry
72.1%Russell Reynolds Associates
1–1Questions led
5Too close to call

Korn Ferry and Russell Reynolds Associates were named in 7 executive search firms questions measured by The Shortlist Report over 1439 AI responses: Korn Ferry in 71.6% of responses and Russell Reynolds Associates in 72.1%, with neither ahead of the other on more questions than the reverse.

How Korn Ferry and Russell Reynolds Associates differ

This data does not establish which firm is better. Korn Ferry’s strongest result relative to Russell Reynolds Associates was on “Which firms specialise in the role we are hiring for?” (90.2% versus 81.7%), while Russell Reynolds Associates’s strongest result relative to Korn Ferry was on “Which search firms deliver genuinely diverse candidate slates?” (59.6% versus 55.3%).

Those are the clearest differences in the shared sample. They measure which firm AI assistants surfaced more often for each buyer question, not service quality or client results.

Question by question

QuestionKorn FerryRussell Reynolds AssociatesAhead
What are the best executive search firms?235 responses99.1%99.1%Same tier — too close to call
Which firms specialise in the role we are hiring for?235 responses90.2%81.7%Korn Ferry
Which search firms know our industry?234 responses85.5%83.8%Same tier — too close to call
Who runs board and chief executive searches?235 responses63.8%69.4%Same tier — too close to call
Which search firms deliver genuinely diverse candidate slates?235 responses55.3%59.6%Russell Reynolds Associates
Our executive search is not working. Who can take over?235 responses41.7%46.0%Same tier — too close to call
Which executive search firms report measurable search outcomes?30 responses23.3%20.0%Same tier — too close to call

How to read this

Share is the percentage of sampled ChatGPT responses to a question that named the firm at all — a measure of visibility, not of the work. A capable firm little has been written about will score low, which is a fact about how often it gets named and not a verdict on whether to hire it.

"Too close to call" is a result, not a gap in the data. Firms are grouped into tiers holding every firm the sample cannot statistically separate from that tier's leader, so two firms in one tier are reported as level however their percentages happen to fall. On 5 of these 7 questions that is what the measurement supports, and saying otherwise would be inventing precision.

Nothing here is our judgement of who is good. It is a count of who gets named. Both firms are measured over the same questions and the same 1439 responses, so neither is being scored on a sample the other did not face.

The full picture on each

Other comparisons