Which GEO agencies work with B2B and SaaS companies?
AEO and GEO Agencies for B2B and SaaS: What The Shortlist Report Finds
5 firms lead, appearing in 25.0–34.5% of 84 AI responses. The sample cannot separate them, so we do not pretend it can.
No clear leader
No single firm dominates this question. Five come up regularly and they specialise in different things, so the firm worth calling is the one that fits your situation rather than whoever sits highest.
Omniscient Digital29 of 84
Provides content strategy, organic search, and AI-search optimization for B2B SaaS companies.
iPullRank27 of 84
Technical SEO and GEO agency for complex enterprise sites and B2B SaaS with AI search readiness capabilities.
Directive26 of 84
Provides enterprise SEO and AI-search strategy integrated with demand generation for B2B and SaaS companies.
First Page Sage26 of 84
Established SEO and content agency offering GEO and AEO/GEO services for enterprise B2B and ecommerce.
Siege Media21 of 84
Combines content marketing, digital PR, SEO, and authority building for content-led and SaaS brands.
Based on 84 ChatGPT responses to this question, collected September 5, 2026–September 20, 2026. Firms are counted once per response. How we measure.
The ranking
| Firm | Responses | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 5 firms, 25.0–34.5% | |||
| Omniscient DigitalProvides content strategy, organic search, and AI-search optimization for B2B SaaS companies. | 29 of 84 | 34.5% | |
| iPullRankipullrank.comTechnical SEO and GEO agency for complex enterprise sites and B2B SaaS with AI search readiness capabilities. | 27 of 84 | 32.1% | |
| DirectiveProvides enterprise SEO and AI-search strategy integrated with demand generation for B2B and SaaS companies. | 26 of 84 | 31.0% | |
| First Page Sagefirstpagesage.comEstablished SEO and content agency offering GEO and AEO/GEO services for enterprise B2B and ecommerce. | 26 of 84 | 31.0% | |
| Siege MediaCombines content marketing, digital PR, SEO, and authority building for content-led and SaaS brands. | 21 of 84 | 25.0% | |
| Tier 2 5 firms, 16.7–17.9% | |||
| LoudFaceloudface.coProvides GEO and SEO services for B2B SaaS companies and startups focused on AI engine buyer discovery. | 15 of 84 | 17.9% | |
| Minuttiaminuttia.comB2B SaaS content and authority building specialist with AI search visibility optimization. | 15 of 84 | 17.9% | |
| Profoundtryprofound.comTracks brand mentions, citations, and recommendation visibility across AI search experiences; also optimizes ecommerce product feeds and schema. | 15 of 84 | 17.9% | |
| SkaleProvides SEO, digital PR, link acquisition and AI-search optimization for SaaS and technology companies. | 15 of 84 | 17.9% | |
| Go Fish Digitalgofishdigital.comTechnical SEO and digital PR agency providing GEO and reputation-focused search work. | 14 of 84 | 16.7% | |
Key findings
- No firm answers “Which GEO agencies work with B2B and SaaS companies?” reliably in ChatGPT. The most-named, Omniscient Digital, appeared in 29 of 84 responses (34.5%) collected September 5, 2026–September 20, 2026, and 4 other firms scored close enough that the sample cannot put any of them in order.
- Omniscient Digital, iPullRank and Directive were named most often, in 26–29 of 84 responses. All 5 firms in the leading group are listed with their counts in the table below.
- 10 firms cleared the reporting threshold on “Which GEO agencies work with B2B and SaaS companies?” in ChatGPT as of September 20, 2026; the full table with response counts is below.
- iPullRank appears in 5 of the 9 AEO, GEO and AI visibility agencies reports published by The Shortlist Report, the widest coverage of any firm named on this page.
- No firm paid to appear in this ranking; placement cannot be bought, and the counts come from ChatGPT responses rather than from submissions.
Why the tiers fall where they do
Tier 1 holds Omniscient Digital, iPullRank, Directive, First Page Sage and Siege Media, named in 21 to 29 of the 84 ChatGPT responses. They are grouped rather than ranked because the gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size — one extra mention would reorder them, so an order would be reporting noise as a finding.
Tier 2 holds LoudFace, Minuttia, Profound, Skale and Go Fish Digital, named in 14 to 15 of 84 responses (16.7–17.9%). The sample does separate these firms from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts them in a tier of their own.
The test is McNemar’s at 95%, applied against the same 84 responses for every firm. The full reasoning, and what happened when we ranked one-to-N instead.
What the sample shows
5 firms lead this question: Omniscient Digital, iPullRank, Directive, First Page Sage and Siege Media. They appear in 25.0–34.5% of the 84 responses. The gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size, so they are listed together rather than ranked against each other.
166 firms were named at least once across the sample. 10 of them cleared the threshold of 2 responses and appear above; the rest were named once and are inside the noise.
How to read this
Firms are grouped into tiers, not ranked one to fifteen. A tier holds every firm whose 95% confidence interval overlaps the leader's, which is a long way of saying the sample cannot tell them apart. Order within a tier is arbitrary — read the counts, not the position.
Share is the percentage of responses that named the firm — not a quality score. A firm scoring low here may be excellent and simply under-written about online, which is a finding about its visibility rather than its work.
The same question was asked repeatedly because AI assistants do not answer identically twice. A single response would tell you almost nothing.
What this measurement does not tell you
- It is not a quality ranking. Share reflects how much has been written about a firm online, which is what an AI assistant reads. A capable firm nobody writes about scores low here.
- It is a reading from a date range, not a permanent standing. This sample was collected September 5, 2026–September 20, 2026; models change and so do their answers.
- It covers ChatGPT only. Other assistants answer differently, and we do not extrapolate across engines we have not measured.
- Order within a tier is arbitrary. Read the counts, not the position. Why we use tiers.
Cite this report
The Shortlist Report. (2026). AEO and GEO Agencies for B2B and SaaS: What The Shortlist Report Finds. The Shortlist Report. https://www.shortlistreport.com/article/geo-agencies-for-b2b-saas
Underlying counts: CSV · JSON. Every answer they were counted from: plain text · JSON. All reusable under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.