Which GEO agencies work with B2B and SaaS companies?
AEO and GEO Agencies for B2B and SaaS: What The Shortlist Report Finds
3 firms lead, appearing in 27.6–33.5% of 254 AI responses. The sample cannot separate them, so we do not pretend it can.
Three firms lead
Omniscient Digital, First Page Sage and iPullRank come up most often here. They are close enough together that the order between them is not worth reading anything into.
Omniscient Digital85 of 254
Provides content strategy, organic search, and AI-search optimization for B2B SaaS companies.
First Page Sage76 of 254
Established SEO and content agency offering GEO and AEO/GEO services for enterprise B2B and ecommerce.
iPullRank70 of 254
Technical SEO and GEO agency for complex enterprise sites and B2B SaaS with AI search readiness capabilities.
Based on 254 ChatGPT responses to this question, collected September 5, 2026–October 29, 2026. Firms are counted once per response. How we measure.
The ranking
| Firm | Responses | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 3 firms, 27.6–33.5% | |||
| Omniscient Digitalomniscientdigital.comProvides content strategy, organic search, and AI-search optimization for B2B SaaS companies. | 85 of 254 | 33.5% | |
| First Page Sagefirstpagesage.comEstablished SEO and content agency offering GEO and AEO/GEO services for enterprise B2B and ecommerce. | 76 of 254 | 29.9% | |
| iPullRankipullrank.comTechnical SEO and GEO agency for complex enterprise sites and B2B SaaS with AI search readiness capabilities. | 70 of 254 | 27.6% | |
| Tier 2 2 firms, 18.1–24.0% | |||
| DirectiveProvides enterprise SEO and AI-search strategy integrated with demand generation for B2B and SaaS companies. | 61 of 254 | 24.0% | |
| LoudFaceloudface.coProvides GEO and SEO services for B2B SaaS companies and startups focused on AI engine buyer discovery. | 46 of 254 | 18.1% | |
| Tier 3 5 firms, 11.8–17.3% | |||
| Siege Mediasiegemedia.comCombines content marketing, digital PR, SEO, and authority building for content-led and SaaS brands. | 44 of 254 | 17.3% | |
| Profoundtryprofound.comTracks brand mentions, citations, and recommendation visibility across AI search experiences; also optimizes ecommerce product feeds and schema. | 43 of 254 | 16.9% | |
| ElevationProvides AEO/GEO services for B2B enterprise companies with multiple stakeholders and lengthy sales cycles. | 36 of 254 | 14.2% | |
| Omniusomnius.soOffers GEO and AI-search visibility services specialized for SaaS and fintech companies. | 34 of 254 | 13.4% | |
| Ascent AI Searchascentaisearch.comProvides AI visibility audits, GEO implementation, and tracking for owner-led professional services firms. | 30 of 254 | 11.8% | |
Key findings
- Omniscient Digital, First Page Sage and iPullRank lead this sample, each named in 27.6–33.5% of 254 ChatGPT responses to the question “Which GEO agencies work with B2B and SaaS companies?”, collected September 5, 2026–October 29, 2026.
- The gaps between Omniscient Digital, First Page Sage and iPullRank are inside the margin of error at 254 responses, so The Shortlist Report groups them in one tier rather than ranking them against each other.
- 10 firms cleared the reporting threshold on “Which GEO agencies work with B2B and SaaS companies?” in ChatGPT as of October 29, 2026; the full table with response counts is below.
- iPullRank appears in 6 of the 11 AEO, GEO and AI visibility agencies reports published by The Shortlist Report, the widest coverage of any firm named on this page.
- No firm paid to appear in this ranking; placement cannot be bought, and the counts come from ChatGPT responses rather than from submissions.
Why the tiers fall where they do
Tier 1 holds Omniscient Digital, First Page Sage and iPullRank, named in 70 to 85 of the 254 ChatGPT responses. They are grouped rather than ranked because the gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size — one extra mention would reorder them, so an order would be reporting noise as a finding.
Tier 2 holds Directive and LoudFace, named in 46 to 61 of 254 responses (18.1–24.0%). The sample does separate these firms from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts them in a tier of their own.
Tier 3 holds Siege Media, Profound, Elevation, Omnius and Ascent AI Search, named in 30 to 44 of 254 responses (11.8–17.3%). The sample does separate these firms from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts them in a tier of their own.
The test is McNemar’s at 95%, applied against the same 254 responses for every firm. The full reasoning, and what happened when we ranked one-to-N instead.
What the sample shows
3 firms lead this question: Omniscient Digital, First Page Sage and iPullRank. They appear in 27.6–33.5% of the 254 responses. The gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size, so they are listed together rather than ranked against each other.
261 firms were named at least once across the sample. 10 of them cleared the threshold of 2 responses and appear above; the rest were named once and are inside the noise.
How to read this
Firms are grouped into tiers, not ranked one to fifteen. A tier holds every firm whose 95% confidence interval overlaps the leader's, which is a long way of saying the sample cannot tell them apart. Order within a tier is arbitrary — read the counts, not the position.
Share is the percentage of responses that named the firm — not a quality score. A firm scoring low here may be excellent and simply under-written about online, which is a finding about its visibility rather than its work.
The same question was asked repeatedly because AI assistants do not answer identically twice. A single response would tell you almost nothing.
What this measurement does not tell you
- It is not a quality ranking. Share reflects how much has been written about a firm online, which is what an AI assistant reads. A capable firm nobody writes about scores low here.
- It is a reading from a date range, not a permanent standing. This sample was collected September 5, 2026–October 29, 2026; models change and so do their answers.
- It covers ChatGPT only. Other assistants answer differently, and we do not extrapolate across engines we have not measured.
- Order within a tier is arbitrary. Read the counts, not the position. Why we use tiers.
Cite this report
The Shortlist Report. (2026). AEO and GEO Agencies for B2B and SaaS: What The Shortlist Report Finds. The Shortlist Report. https://www.shortlistreport.com/article/geo-agencies-for-b2b-saas
Underlying counts: CSV · JSON. Every answer they were counted from: plain text · JSON. All reusable under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.