Which AI visibility agencies work with ecommerce brands?
AEO and GEO Agencies for Ecommerce Brands: What The Shortlist Report Finds
2 firms lead, appearing in 36.4–38.1% of 236 AI responses. The sample cannot separate them, so we do not pretend it can.
Two firms lead
Siege Media and Go Fish Digital come up most often here. They are close enough together that the order between them is not worth reading anything into.
Siege Media90 of 236
Combines content marketing, digital PR, SEO, and authority building for content-led and SaaS brands.
Go Fish Digital86 of 236
Technical SEO and digital PR agency providing GEO and reputation-focused search work.
Based on 236 ChatGPT responses to this question, collected September 4, 2026–October 29, 2026. Firms are counted once per response. How we measure.
The ranking
| Firm | Responses | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 2 firms, 36.4–38.1% | |||
| Siege Mediasiegemedia.comCombines content marketing, digital PR, SEO, and authority building for content-led and SaaS brands. | 90 of 236 | 38.1% | |
| Go Fish Digitalthegofishdigital.comTechnical SEO and digital PR agency providing GEO and reputation-focused search work. | 86 of 236 | 36.4% | |
| Tier 2 2 firms, 32.6–32.6% | |||
| Charlecharleagency.comProvides Shopify-native GEO services focused on AI discovery, product optimization, and structured data for ecommerce brands. | 77 of 236 | 32.6% | |
| Tinuititinuiti.comMarketplace and retail media commerce marketing, paid media, and AI-search visibility for ecommerce brands. | 77 of 236 | 32.6% | |
| Tier 3 5 firms, 15.3–22.5% | |||
| WRKNG Digitalwrkngdigital.comGets Shopify products cited and recommended by AI shopping assistants through AEO and GEO. | 53 of 236 | 22.5% | |
| First Page Sagefirstpagesage.comEstablished SEO and content agency offering GEO and AEO/GEO services for enterprise B2B and ecommerce. | 46 of 236 | 19.5% | |
| Constructorconstructor.comProvides AI-powered search, product discovery, recommendations, and shopping agents for ecommerce businesses. | 42 of 236 | 17.8% | |
| Geostargeostar.aiShopify DTC ecommerce GEO specialist focused on product catalogs and AI citations. | 37 of 236 | 15.7% | |
| Algoliaalgolia.comProvides AI-powered search and discovery infrastructure for ecommerce websites and apps. | 36 of 236 | 15.3% | |
| Tier 4 stands alone | |||
| Profoundtryprofound.comTracks brand mentions, citations, and recommendation visibility across AI search experiences; also optimizes ecommerce product feeds and schema. | 34 of 236 | 14.4% | |
Key findings
- Siege Media and Go Fish Digital lead this sample, each named in 36.4–38.1% of 236 ChatGPT responses to the question “Which AI visibility agencies work with ecommerce brands?”, collected September 4, 2026–October 29, 2026.
- The gaps between Siege Media and Go Fish Digital are inside the margin of error at 236 responses, so The Shortlist Report groups them in one tier rather than ranking them against each other.
- 10 firms cleared the reporting threshold on “Which AI visibility agencies work with ecommerce brands?” in ChatGPT as of October 29, 2026; the full table with response counts is below.
- Siege Media appears in 5 of the 11 AEO, GEO and AI visibility agencies reports published by The Shortlist Report, the widest coverage of any firm named on this page.
- No firm paid to appear in this ranking; placement cannot be bought, and the counts come from ChatGPT responses rather than from submissions.
Why the tiers fall where they do
Tier 1 holds Siege Media and Go Fish Digital, named in 86 to 90 of the 236 ChatGPT responses. They are grouped rather than ranked because the gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size — one extra mention would reorder them, so an order would be reporting noise as a finding.
Tier 2 holds Charle and Tinuiti, named in 77 to 77 of 236 responses (32.6–32.6%). The sample does separate these firms from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts them in a tier of their own.
Tier 3 holds WRKNG Digital, First Page Sage, Constructor, Geostar and Algolia, named in 36 to 53 of 236 responses (15.3–22.5%). The sample does separate these firms from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts them in a tier of their own.
Tier 4 holds Profound, named in 34 to 34 of 236 responses (14.4–14.4%). The sample does separate this firm from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts it in a tier of its own.
The test is McNemar’s at 95%, applied against the same 236 responses for every firm. The full reasoning, and what happened when we ranked one-to-N instead.
What the sample shows
2 firms lead this question: Siege Media and Go Fish Digital. They appear in 36.4–38.1% of the 236 responses. The gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size, so they are listed together rather than ranked against each other.
209 firms were named at least once across the sample. 10 of them cleared the threshold of 2 responses and appear above; the rest were named once and are inside the noise.
How to read this
Firms are grouped into tiers, not ranked one to fifteen. A tier holds every firm whose 95% confidence interval overlaps the leader's, which is a long way of saying the sample cannot tell them apart. Order within a tier is arbitrary — read the counts, not the position.
Share is the percentage of responses that named the firm — not a quality score. A firm scoring low here may be excellent and simply under-written about online, which is a finding about its visibility rather than its work.
The same question was asked repeatedly because AI assistants do not answer identically twice. A single response would tell you almost nothing.
What this measurement does not tell you
- It is not a quality ranking. Share reflects how much has been written about a firm online, which is what an AI assistant reads. A capable firm nobody writes about scores low here.
- It is a reading from a date range, not a permanent standing. This sample was collected September 4, 2026–October 29, 2026; models change and so do their answers.
- It covers ChatGPT only. Other assistants answer differently, and we do not extrapolate across engines we have not measured.
- Order within a tier is arbitrary. Read the counts, not the position. Why we use tiers.
Cite this report
The Shortlist Report. (2026). AEO and GEO Agencies for Ecommerce Brands: What The Shortlist Report Finds. The Shortlist Report. https://www.shortlistreport.com/article/geo-agencies-for-ecommerce
Underlying counts: CSV · JSON. Every answer they were counted from: plain text · JSON. All reusable under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.