Which Amazon agencies specialise in my category?
Amazon Agencies by Vertical: What The Shortlist Report Finds
2 firms lead, appearing in 42.0–44.1% of 295 AI responses. The sample cannot separate them, so we do not pretend it can.
Two firms lead
Tinuiti and Lab 916 come up most often here. They are close enough together that the order between them is not worth reading anything into.
Based on 295 ChatGPT responses to this question, collected August 11, 2026–October 6, 2026. Firms are counted once per response. How we measure.
The ranking
| Firm | Responses | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 2 firms, 42.0–44.1% | |||
| Tinuititinuiti.comWorks with large brands on Amazon Ads, DSP, AMC, and omnichannel media across the full funnel with significant Amazon-side expertise. | 130 of 295 | 44.1% | |
| Lab 916lab916.comProvides Amazon storefront design, photography, visual content, and A+ content creation for premium brands. | 124 of 295 | 42.0% | |
| Tier 2 2 firms, 29.5–35.3% | |||
| Enso Brandsensobrands.com | 104 of 295 | 35.3% | |
| Brandwovengobrandwoven.comManages Amazon, Walmart and Target accounts including marketplace operations, reseller management and international expansion. | 87 of 295 | 29.5% | |
| Tier 3 stands alone | |||
| Patternpattern.comManages marketplace operations, advertising, retail strategy, and international expansion for enterprise brands across Amazon and multiple marketplaces. | 74 of 295 | 25.1% | |
| Tier 4 7 firms, 13.6–19.0% | |||
| Acadiaacadia.ioProvides Amazon advertising, retail media, SEO and performance marketing for enterprise and high-growth consumer brands. | 56 of 295 | 19.0% | |
| Envision Horizonsenvisionhorizons.comProvides Amazon brand management, catalog, SEO, PPC, and retail media services for established consumer brands. | 54 of 295 | 18.3% | |
| Nuanced Medianuancedmedia.comAmazon-specialist offering marketplace strategy, advertising, creative optimization, and growth services for mid-market brands. | 54 of 295 | 18.3% | |
| ConviseManages PPC, SEO, listings and Seller/Vendor Central for beauty, personal care, health and wellness brands across US, UK and Europe. | 47 of 295 | 15.9% | |
| Alpha Spikesalphaspikes.comManages Amazon SEO, PPC, listings, creative, catalog, and inventory for Home & Kitchen brands. | 42 of 295 | 14.2% | |
| Olifant Digitalolifantdigital.comSeller Central operations, PPC, listings, catalog and international expansion for mid-sized brands. | 41 of 295 | 13.9% | |
| My Amazon Guymyamazonguy.comProvides PPC, SEO, listing optimization, creative, and account management for brands needing hands-on Amazon execution. | 40 of 295 | 13.6% | |
Key findings
- Tinuiti and Lab 916 lead this sample, each named in 42.0–44.1% of 295 ChatGPT responses to the question “Which Amazon agencies specialise in my category?”, collected August 11, 2026–October 6, 2026.
- The gaps between Tinuiti and Lab 916 are inside the margin of error at 295 responses, so The Shortlist Report groups them in one tier rather than ranking them against each other.
- 12 firms cleared the reporting threshold on “Which Amazon agencies specialise in my category?” in ChatGPT as of October 6, 2026; the full table with response counts is below.
- Tinuiti appears in 8 of the 14 Amazon agencies reports published by The Shortlist Report, the widest coverage of any firm named on this page.
- No firm paid to appear in this ranking; placement cannot be bought, and the counts come from ChatGPT responses rather than from submissions.
Why the tiers fall where they do
Tier 1 holds Tinuiti and Lab 916, named in 124 to 130 of the 295 ChatGPT responses. They are grouped rather than ranked because the gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size — one extra mention would reorder them, so an order would be reporting noise as a finding.
Tier 2 holds Enso Brands and Brandwoven, named in 87 to 104 of 295 responses (29.5–35.3%). The sample does separate these firms from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts them in a tier of their own.
Tier 3 holds Pattern, named in 74 to 74 of 295 responses (25.1–25.1%). The sample does separate this firm from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts it in a tier of its own.
Tier 4 holds Acadia, Envision Horizons, Nuanced Media, Convise, Alpha Spikes, Olifant Digital and My Amazon Guy, named in 40 to 56 of 295 responses (13.6–19.0%). The sample does separate these firms from the tier above: the difference from the leading group is larger than the margin of error, which is what puts them in a tier of their own.
The test is McNemar’s at 95%, applied against the same 295 responses for every firm. The full reasoning, and what happened when we ranked one-to-N instead.
What the sample shows
2 firms lead this question: Tinuiti and Lab 916. They appear in 42.0–44.1% of the 295 responses. The gaps between them are inside the margin of error at this sample size, so they are listed together rather than ranked against each other.
165 firms were named at least once across the sample. 12 of them cleared the threshold of 2 responses and appear above; the rest were named once and are inside the noise.
How to read this
Firms are grouped into tiers, not ranked one to fifteen. A tier holds every firm whose 95% confidence interval overlaps the leader's, which is a long way of saying the sample cannot tell them apart. Order within a tier is arbitrary — read the counts, not the position.
Share is the percentage of responses that named the firm — not a quality score. A firm scoring low here may be excellent and simply under-written about online, which is a finding about its visibility rather than its work.
The same question was asked repeatedly because AI assistants do not answer identically twice. A single response would tell you almost nothing.
What this measurement does not tell you
- It is not a quality ranking. Share reflects how much has been written about a firm online, which is what an AI assistant reads. A capable firm nobody writes about scores low here.
- It is a reading from a date range, not a permanent standing. This sample was collected August 11, 2026–October 6, 2026; models change and so do their answers.
- It covers ChatGPT only. Other assistants answer differently, and we do not extrapolate across engines we have not measured.
- Order within a tier is arbitrary. Read the counts, not the position. Why we use tiers.
Cite this report
The Shortlist Report. (2026). Amazon Agencies by Vertical: What The Shortlist Report Finds. The Shortlist Report. https://www.shortlistreport.com/article/amazon-agencies-by-vertical
Underlying counts: CSV · JSON. Every answer they were counted from: plain text · JSON. All reusable under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.